What does the recent Supreme Court case, Sackett vs. EPA, mean for the Clean Water Act? Join us as we explore this landmark case with Brent Fewell, Founder of the Earth & Water Law Group, who possesses over 30 years of experience at the intersection of water and law. Dive into the jurisdictional determination of the Sacketts' property near Priest Lake in Idaho, the Supreme Court's decision that wetlands are not federally protected, and how this ruling may shape the future of the Clean Water Act.
Navigating the changing landscape of wetland protection can be daunting. In this episode, Brent shares valuable insights into the risks and opportunities associated with the Sackett vs. EPA case. Discover how state laws may offer protection for wetlands, and how it might impact environmental and industrial organizations. The decision has the potential to stir up increased activity at the state level, reinforcing the protection of wetlands.
As we look ahead to the murky future of water regulation, Brent offers his thoughts on the implications of the Sackett vs. EPA case and how it may influence the Clean Water Act. We'll explore the 'SWANCC' decision and how the EPA and the courts regained expansive authorities after this ruling, the 'Rapanos' decision, and the (now defunct) 'significant nexus' test established by the court. Finally, Brent shares his perspective on the potential for Congress to provide clarity and direction to the world of water in the coming years. Don't miss this informative and thought-provoking episode.
#water #WaterForesight #strategicforesight #foresight #futures @Aqualaurus